Skip to main content

About Justice Beacon Solutions

Leadership

Stephanie L. Fleming, PhD, MS

Stephanie L. Fleming, PhD, MS

Founder & Principal, Justice Beacon Solutions, LLC

LinkedIn

Stephanie L. Fleming, PhD, MS is the founder and principal of Justice Beacon Solutions, LLC and the creator of Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™) -- the first governance discipline built specifically to document how humans interpret, rely on, and act on AI-supported outputs in justice decision-making environments.

Fleming introduced Justice Decision Observability™ to address a structural oversight gap that most institutions have not yet named: the space between what AI systems produce and what humans do with that information. Her work establishes that this space -- where discretion is exercised, where policy meets operational pressure, and where decisions are made and justified -- is currently ungoverned and undocumented in most justice environments.

With more than 28 years embedded across the justice and behavioral health ecosystem, Fleming brings to governance work a perspective that is simultaneously clinical, academic, operational, and lived. Formerly a licensed mental health therapist specializing in trauma and EMDR, an adjunct professor in psychology and research methods, and a practitioner who worked directly inside correctional institutions, she also navigated the criminal legal system as a justice-impacted individual -- giving her an applied understanding of institutional decision-making that no credential alone can produce.

Her work is grounded in social psychology, research methodology, and the study of human behavior in high-stakes institutional environments -- disciplines that together form the analytical foundation for everything Justice Beacon Solutions produces.

That work has produced a complete governance architecture for the field she created: Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™), the Deployment Context Risk Review (DCRR™), Critical Event Governance Reconstruction (CEGR™), Decision Risk Pattern Intelligence (DRPI™), the Justice Beacon Doctrine Framework™ (JB-DOF™), and JAOGS™ v1.0 -- the Justice Automated Operational Governance Standard, for which Justice Beacon Solutions serves as the certifying authority.

Janna M. Broaddus

Janna M. Broaddus

Director of Operations, Justice Beacon Solutions, LLC

LinkedIn

Janna M. Broaddus is the Director of Operations at Justice Beacon Solutions, LLC and a co-author of the foundational documents defining Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™). She leads operational governance processes, documentation integrity, and structured oversight coordination across all JBS engagements.

Broaddus oversees governance reviews, documentation protocols, and structured reporting used to capture how human decision-makers interpret, rely on, and act on AI-supported outputs in real-world justice environments. Her work ensures that every JBS engagement produces governance-grade documentation that institutions can rely on during oversight inquiries, incident review, litigation, or internal accountability processes.

Her contribution to JBS is rooted in both operational expertise and lived experience. Broaddus brings extensive direct experience working in reentry, recovery-oriented services, and justice-impacted communities -- supporting individuals affected by incarceration, substance use, and behavioral health challenges. That background provides applied insight into how institutional design, operational pressure, and systemic gaps shape the decision environments JBS is built to document.

Broaddus is also a justice-impacted individual who rebuilt her professional path through sustained commitment to governance work. Her academic training is grounded in human behavior, psychology, and the dynamics of correctional environments -- providing the analytical foundation that informs how she approaches governance documentation in high-stakes institutional settings.

As a co-author of Justice Decision Observability™ framework materials, Broaddus plays a central role in translating governance concepts into operational documentation practices that institutions can implement, sustain, and defend. Her work demonstrates that the most credible governance insight comes from people who understand what is actually at stake.

Why JBS Exists

AI produces signals. Humans exercise authority.

What happens between those two moments is rarely documented.

Every framework for “responsible AI” assumes that human oversight is visible and verifiable. It is not.

Governance does not fail at procurement. It fails at execution -- when a decision is made and no record exists of how it formed.

Justice Beacon Solutions exists to document that moment.

The Governance Gap

AI systems generate outputs.

Human decision-makers interpret them.

Institutional authority produces the outcome.

Between these steps lies an undocumented space -- the interpretive pathway where decisions actually form.

Most institutions cannot document or examine it.

Most oversight bodies cannot examine it.

This is the governance gap.

Three officers walking -- who owns the decision? The decision visibility gap in justice environments.

What We Do

Justice Beacon Solutions documents how decisions form in real-world environments where AI influences human judgment.

We document the pathway between:

  • system signal
  • human interpretation
  • exercised authority
  • institutional action

This work is defined through Justice Decision Observability™ (JDO™) -- the discipline focused on making execution-layer decision-making visible, documentable, and governable in practice.

What We Do Not Do

JBS operates within a clearly defined boundary:

  • We do not audit algorithms
  • We do not evaluate system performance
  • We do not assign fault or conduct investigations
  • We do not produce compliance reports

We document how decisions are made.

How Our Work Is Different

JBS operates at the execution layer.

Our work is:

  • descriptive, not evaluative
  • independent, not embedded
  • observational, not prescriptive

We document what happens -- not what should have happened.

This distinction is what makes governance documentation credible, defensible, and usable across legal, operational, and oversight contexts.

Why Institutions Trust JBS

No commercial relationship with technology vendors

No role in system procurement or evaluation

No incentive to influence outcomes

Independence is the foundation of defensibility.

If a decision cannot be documented, it cannot be explained.

If it cannot be explained, it cannot be defended.

Advisory Board

Troy Richard Carr

Troy Richard Carr

Technology & Digital Strategy Advisor

Troy Carr advises Justice Beacon Solutions on digital infrastructure, platform architecture, and AI-native visibility strategy. He is the principal of The Midnight Garden, a technology consultancy serving justice-adjacent and mission-driven organizations.

LinkedIn

Additional advisory board members spanning criminal justice administration, defense law, AI governance, and justice-impacted community leadership will be announced in 2026.